Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 17:16:24 -0700 you wrote: > Add BTF field (type and string fields, right now) iterator support instead of > using existing callback-based approaches, which make it harder to understand > and support BTF-processing code. > > v1->v2: > - t_cnt -> t_off_cnt, m_cnt -> m_off_cnt (Eduard); > - simpified code in linker.c (Jiri); > rfcv1->v1: > - check errors when initializing iterators (Jiri); > - split RFC patch into separate patches. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [v2,bpf-next,1/5] libbpf: add BTF field iterator https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/68153bb2fffb - [v2,bpf-next,2/5] libbpf: make use of BTF field iterator in BPF linker code https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2bce2c1cb2f0 - [v2,bpf-next,3/5] libbpf: make use of BTF field iterator in BTF handling code https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c2641123696b - [v2,bpf-next,4/5] bpftool: use BTF field iterator in btfgen https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e1a8630291fd - [v2,bpf-next,5/5] libbpf: remove callback-based type/string BTF field visitor helpers https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/072088704433 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html