On 05/06/2024 09:52, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 05:16:24PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: >> Add BTF field (type and string fields, right now) iterator support instead of >> using existing callback-based approaches, which make it harder to understand >> and support BTF-processing code. >> >> v1->v2: >> - t_cnt -> t_off_cnt, m_cnt -> m_off_cnt (Eduard); >> - simpified code in linker.c (Jiri); >> rfcv1->v1: >> - check errors when initializing iterators (Jiri); >> - split RFC patch into separate patches. >> >> Andrii Nakryiko (5): >> libbpf: add BTF field iterator >> libbpf: make use of BTF field iterator in BPF linker code >> libbpf: make use of BTF field iterator in BTF handling code >> bpftool: use BTF field iterator in btfgen >> libbpf: remove callback-based type/string BTF field visitor helpers > > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> > Retested v2, all looks good Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx> > jirka > >> >> tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c | 16 +- >> tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 328 +++++++++++++++++++------------- >> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 26 ++- >> tools/lib/bpf/linker.c | 58 +++--- >> 4 files changed, 262 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.43.0 >>
