Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/6] Introduce the BPF dispatcher

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 at 18:42, Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
[...]
> > You mentioned in the earlier version that this would impact the time it
> > takes to attach an XDP program. Got any numbers for this?
> >
>
> Ah, no, I forgot to measure that. I'll get back with that. So, when a
> new program is entered or removed from dispatcher, it needs to be
> re-jited, but more importantly -- a text poke is needed. I don't know
> if this is a concern or not, but let's measure it.
>

Toke, I tried to measure the impact, but didn't really get anything
useful out. :-(

My concern was mainly that text-poking is a point of contention, and
it messes with the icache. As for contention, we're already
synchronized around the rtnl-lock. As for the icache-flush effects...
well... I'm open to suggestions how to measure the impact in a useful
way.

>
> Björn
>
> > -Toke
> >




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux