Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/6] Introduce the BPF dispatcher

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 at 16:00, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
[...]
>
> I like the new version where it's integrated into bpf_prog_run_xdp();
> nice! :)
>

Yes, me too! Nice suggestion!

> > The XDP dispatcher is always enabled, if available, because it helps
> > even when retpolines are disabled. Please refer to the "Performance"
> > section below.
>
> Looking at those numbers, I think I would moderate "helps" to "doesn't
> hurt" - a difference of less than 1ns is basically in the noise.
>
> You mentioned in the earlier version that this would impact the time it
> takes to attach an XDP program. Got any numbers for this?
>

Ah, no, I forgot to measure that. I'll get back with that. So, when a
new program is entered or removed from dispatcher, it needs to be
re-jited, but more importantly -- a text poke is needed. I don't know
if this is a concern or not, but let's measure it.


Björn

> -Toke
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux