Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the net tree

[Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 4/29/24 8:56 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 11:49:39 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >   +u64 __weak bpf_arch_uaddress_limit(void)
> >   +{
> >   +#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE)
> >   +	return TASK_SIZE;
> >   +#else
> >   +	return 0;
> >   +#endif
> >   +}
> >   +
> > + bool __weak bpf_jit_supports_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn, bool in_arena)
> > + {
> > + 	return false;
> > + }
>
> Thanks! FTR I plan to used the inverse order, if that matters..

Yeap, that looks cleaner, same for the signature in the header given the others
prefixed with bpf_jit_supports_*.

Thanks,
Daniel