On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 11:49:39 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > +u64 __weak bpf_arch_uaddress_limit(void) > +{ > +#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE) > + return TASK_SIZE; > +#else > + return 0; > +#endif > +} > + > + bool __weak bpf_jit_supports_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn, bool in_arena) > + { > + return false; > + } Thanks! FTR I plan to used the inverse order, if that matters..