On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:09:42PM -0700, Dave Thaler wrote: > The proposed intro paragraph text is derived from the first paragraph > of the IETF BPF WG charter at https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/bpf/about/ > > Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst > index d03d90afb..b44bdacd0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst > +++ b/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst > @@ -5,7 +5,11 @@ > BPF Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) > ====================================== > > -This document specifies the BPF instruction set architecture (ISA). > +eBPF (which is no longer an acronym for anything), also commonly > +referred to as BPF, is a technology with origins in the Linux kernel > +that can run untrusted programs in a privileged context such as an Perhaps this should be phrased as: ...that can run untrusted programs in privileged contexts such as the operating system kernel. Not sure if that's actually a grammar correction but it sounds more correct in my head. Wdyt? Regardless: Acked-by: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > +operating system kernel. This document specifies the BPF instruction > +set architecture (ISA). > > Documentation conventions > ========================= > -- > 2.40.1 > > -- > Bpf mailing list > Bpf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bpf
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
