On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 7:34 AM Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 10:23 AM Alexei Starovoitov > <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 5:08 AM Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > My view is this series should still be applied with the nacks since it > > > sits entirely on its own silo within networking/TC (and has nothing to > > > do with ebpf). > > > > My Nack applies to the whole set. The kernel doesn't need this anti-feature > > for many reasons already explained. > > Can you be more explicit? What else would you add to the list i posted above? Since you're refusing to work with us your only option is to mention my Nack in the cover letter and send it as a PR to Linus during the merge window.
