On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 5:08 AM Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > My view is this series should still be applied with the nacks since it > sits entirely on its own silo within networking/TC (and has nothing to > do with ebpf). My Nack applies to the whole set. The kernel doesn't need this anti-feature for many reasons already explained.
