Re: [Bpf] Follow up on "call helper function by address" terminology
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Subject
: Re: [Bpf] Follow up on "call helper function by address" terminology
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 00:01:24 -0700
Cc
: "'Watson Ladd'" <watsonbladd@xxxxxxxxx>, "'David Vernet'" <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <003001da8907$efd41140$cf7c33c0$@gmail.com>
Maybe "static ID", or "pre-assigned" id?
Follow-Ups
:
RE: [Bpf] Follow up on "call helper function by address" terminology
From:
dthaler1968
References
:
Follow up on "call helper function by address" terminology
From:
dthaler1968
Re: [Bpf] Follow up on "call helper function by address" terminology
From:
David Vernet
Re: [Bpf] Follow up on "call helper function by address" terminology
From:
Watson Ladd
RE: [Bpf] Follow up on "call helper function by address" terminology
From:
dthaler1968
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: enable the "open" operator on a pinned path of a struct_osp link.
Next by Date:
[PATCH bpf] xdp: use flags field to disambiguate broadcast redirect
Previous by thread:
RE: [Bpf] Follow up on "call helper function by address" terminology
Next by thread:
RE: [Bpf] Follow up on "call helper function by address" terminology
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Samsung SoC]
[Linux Rockchip SoC]
[Linux Actions SoC]
[Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]
[Linux NFS]
[Linux NILFS]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
