Re: [Bpf] Follow up on "call helper function by address" terminology

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 01:10:38PM -0700, dthaler1968=40googlemail.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> At IETF 119, we agreed that "by address" should be changed to
> something else in the ISA.  The term "legacy ID" was used during the
> discussion but Christoph (if I remember right) pointed out that such
> IDs are not deprecated per se.  Hence "legacy" may not be the right
> word since we use that word with legacy packet access instructions
> that are deprecated. We decided to take further discussion to the
> list, hence this email.
> 
> We need some term to distinguish them from BTF IDs, so another
> alternative might be "non-BTF ID".

Non-BTF ID is fine with me. Any objections?

Thanks,
David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux