Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Add internal-only BPF per-CPU instructions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Add internal-only BPF per-CPU instructions
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 12:13:47 +0300
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ast@xxxxxxxxxx, daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx, kernel-team@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAEf4BzaSaWt6pLR1xj4Lv=dccr2sQhac4AC__BrR13ryb3Fymg@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Evolution 3.50.3

On Mon, 2024-04-01 at 15:54 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
[...]

> > Hi Andrii,
> > 
> > I've read through the series and it looks good
> > (modulo architecture related issues reported by CI).
> 
> Should I add your acks in the next revision?

Sure, please do.

References:
- [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Add internal-only BPF per-CPU instructions
  - From: Andrii Nakryiko
- Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Add internal-only BPF per-CPU instructions
  - From: Eduard Zingerman
- Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Add internal-only BPF per-CPU instructions
  - From: Andrii Nakryiko

Prev by Date: Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] possible deadlock in wq_worker_tick
Next by Date: [PATCHv2 0/3] uprobe: uretprobe speed up
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Add internal-only BPF per-CPU instructions
Next by thread: [PATCH net] mptcp: prevent BPF accessing lowat from a subflow socket.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux