Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] possible deadlock in wq_worker_tick
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Subject
: Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] possible deadlock in wq_worker_tick
From
: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:06:10 +0200
Cc
: andrii@xxxxxxxxxx, ast@xxxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx, john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx, syzkaller-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
000000000000d8fd6b06141e73a4@google.com
>
#syz dup: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] possible deadlock in ahci_single_level_irq_intr
References
:
[syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] possible deadlock in wq_worker_tick
From:
syzbot
Prev by Date:
Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] possible deadlock in tick_setup_sched_timer
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Add internal-only BPF per-CPU instructions
Previous by thread:
[syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] possible deadlock in wq_worker_tick
Next by thread:
[LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Implementing BPF_PROG_LOAD_FD
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Samsung SoC]
[Linux Rockchip SoC]
[Linux Actions SoC]
[Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]
[Linux NFS]
[Linux NILFS]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
