On 11/26/19 3:45 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > On 11/26, John Fastabend wrote: >> Stanislav Fomichev wrote: >>> If vmlinux BTF generation fails, but CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is set, >>> .BTF section of vmlinux is empty and kernel will prohibit >>> BPF loading and return "in-kernel BTF is malformed". >>> >>> --dump-section argument to binutils' objcopy was added in version 2.25. >>> When using pre-2.25 binutils, BTF generation silently fails. Convert >>> to --only-section which is present on pre-2.25 binutils. >>> >>> Documentation/process/changes.rst states that binutils 2.21+ >>> is supported, not sure those standards apply to BPF subsystem. >>> >>> v2: >>> * exit and print an error if gen_btf fails (John Fastabend) >>> >>> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx> >>> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Fixes: 341dfcf8d78ea ("btf: expose BTF info through sysfs") >>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> scripts/link-vmlinux.sh | 7 ++++++- >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/scripts/link-vmlinux.sh b/scripts/link-vmlinux.sh >>> index 06495379fcd8..2998ddb323e3 100755 >>> --- a/scripts/link-vmlinux.sh >>> +++ b/scripts/link-vmlinux.sh >>> @@ -127,7 +127,8 @@ gen_btf() >>> cut -d, -f1 | cut -d' ' -f2) >>> bin_format=$(LANG=C ${OBJDUMP} -f ${1} | grep 'file format' | \ >>> awk '{print $4}') >>> - ${OBJCOPY} --dump-section .BTF=.btf.vmlinux.bin ${1} 2>/dev/null >>> + ${OBJCOPY} --set-section-flags .BTF=alloc -O binary \ >>> + --only-section=.BTF ${1} .btf.vmlinux.bin 2>/dev/null >>> ${OBJCOPY} -I binary -O ${bin_format} -B ${bin_arch} \ >>> --rename-section .data=.BTF .btf.vmlinux.bin ${2} >>> } >>> @@ -253,6 +254,10 @@ btf_vmlinux_bin_o="" >>> if [ -n "${CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF}" ]; then >>> if gen_btf .tmp_vmlinux.btf .btf.vmlinux.bin.o ; then >>> btf_vmlinux_bin_o=.btf.vmlinux.bin.o >>> + else >>> + echo >&2 "Failed to generate BTF for vmlinux" >>> + echo >&2 "Try to disable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF" >> >> I think we should encourage upgrading binutils first? Maybe >> >> "binutils 2.25+ required for BTF please upgrade or disable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF" >> >> otherwise I guess its going to be a bit mystical why it works in >> cases and not others to folks unfamiliar with the details. > With the conversion from --dump-section to --only-section that I > did in this patch, binutils 2.25+ is no longer a requirement. > 2.21 (minimal version from Documentation/process/changes.rst) should work > just fine. Yeah, instead it's better to mention that pahole v1.13+ is required. >