[PATCH] Inaccurate rejection conditions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Signed-off-by: Tao Lyu <tao.lyu@xxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Hi,

I am sorry to bother you due to my confusion on constraints about stack writes.

1. When an instruction stores 64-bit values onto the stack with fixed offset and BPF_CAP only,
   the verifier marks the stack slot type as STACK_SPILL, no matter whether they are scalar or pointers.

2. Then, a store instruction with a **32-bit scalar value** on the same stack slot leads to a verification rejection.
   As it says, this might corrupt the stack pointer by asserting if the stack slot type is STACK_SPILL. 
   However, even if the stack slot type is STACK_SPILL, it might store a 64-bit scalar and not a stack pointer.
   IMHO, this "issue" might originate from the incomplete conditions in the check_stack_write_fixed_off() function below.
   It only checks if the stack slot is a spilled register but forgets to check if the spilled register type is a pointer.

 4479 static int check_stack_write_fixed_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 ...
 4494     if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks &&
 4495         is_spilled_reg(&state->stack[spi]) &&
 4496         size != BPF_REG_SIZE) {
 4497         verbose(env, "attempt to corrupt spilled pointer on stack\n");
 4498         return -EACCES;
 4499     }
 ...
 4600 }

Below is an example bpf program, which stores a 64-bit and 32-bit immediate value on the same stack slot.
But the second one gets rejected due to the above.

0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
; asm volatile ( @ repro.bpf.c:679
0: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 1          ; R10=fp0 fp-8_w=1
1: (62) *(u32 *)(r10 -8) = 1
attempt to corrupt spilled pointer on stack
processed 2 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0.

If my understanding is correct, then we can apply the attached patch.

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index de7813947981..65f7eb315e9c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -4493,6 +4493,7 @@ static int check_stack_write_fixed_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	 */
 	if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks &&
 	    is_spilled_reg(&state->stack[spi]) &&
+	    state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.type != SCALAR_VALUE &&
 	    size != BPF_REG_SIZE) {
 		verbose(env, "attempt to corrupt spilled pointer on stack\n");
 		return -EACCES;
-- 
2.25.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux