Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] virtio-net: support device stats

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 09:04:21AM CET, xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:12:23 +0100, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 13:19 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 12:53:38PM CET, xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 12:52:18 +0100, Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > > > Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 12:05:53PM CET, xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> > > > > As the spec:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/commit/42f389989823039724f95bbbd243291ab0064f82
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The virtio net supports to get device stats.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Please review.
>> > > >
>> > > > net-next is closed. Please resubmit next week.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > For review.
>> >
>> > RFC, or wait.
>>
>> @Xuan, please note that you received exactly the same feedback on your
>> previous submission, a few days ago. While I do understand the legit
>> interest in reviews, ignoring explicit feedback tend to bring no
>> feedback at all.
>
>Sorry.
>
>I have a question regarding the workflow for feature discussions. If we
>consistently engage in discussions about a particular feature, this may result
>in the submission of multiple patch sets. In light of this, should we modify the
>usage of "PATCH" or "RFC" in our submissions depending on whether the merge

No, just wait 2 weeks, simple.


>window is open or closed? This causes the title of our patch sets to keep
>changing.
>
>Or I miss something.
>
>
>Thanks.
>
>
>>
>> Paolo
>>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux