Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: extend uprobe/uretprobe triggering benchmarks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Fri,  1 Mar 2024 13:45:51 -0800 you wrote:
> Settle on three "flavors" of uprobe/uretprobe, installed on different
> kinds of instruction: nop, push, and ret. All three are testing
> different internal code paths emulating or single-stepping instructions,
> so are interesting to compare and benchmark separately.
> 
> To ensure `push rbp` instruction we ensure that uprobe_target_push() is
> not a leaf function by calling (global __weak) noop function and
> returning something afterwards (if we don't do that, compiler will just
> do a tail call optimization).
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: extend uprobe/uretprobe triggering benchmarks
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8f79870ec8a9

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux