On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 1:39 PM <dthaler1968=40googlemail.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The Internet Draft filename is draft-ietf-bpf-isa-XX, and the charter has: > > [PS] the BPF instruction set architecture (ISA) that defines the > > instructions and low-level virtual machine for BPF programs, > > That is, "instruction set architecture (ISA)", but the document itself has: > > ======================================= > > BPF Instruction Set Specification, v1.0 > > ======================================= > > > > This document specifies version 1.0 of the BPF instruction set. > > Notably, no "architecture (ISA)". Also, we now have a mechanism > to extend it with conformance groups over time, so "v1.0" seems > less relevant and perhaps not important given there's only one > version being standardized at present. > > What do folks think about changing the doc to say: > > ======================================= > > BPF Instruction Set Architecture > > ======================================= > > > > This document specifies the BPF instruction set architecture (ISA). > ? Good idea. Makes sense to me.
