On 2024/1/23 0:30, Björn Töpel wrote:
Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 2024/1/22 23:07, Björn Töpel wrote:
Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 2024/1/22 22:33, Björn Töpel wrote:
Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Add Zbb support [0] to optimize code size and performance of RV64 JIT.
Meanwhile, adjust the code for unification and simplification. Tests
test_bpf.ko and test_verifier have passed, as well as the relative
testcases of test_progs*.
Link: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/releases/download/1.0.0/bitmanip-1.0.0-38-g865e7a7.pdf [0]
v3 resend:
- resend for mail be treated as spam.
v3:
- Change to early-exit code style and make code more explicit.
Lehui,
Sorry for the delay. I'm chasing a struct_ops RISC-V BPF regression in
6.8-rc1, I will need to wrap my head around that prior reviewing
properly.
Oh, I also found the problem with struct ops and fixed it
Pu, with your patch bpf_iter_setsockopt, bpf_tcp_ca, and dummy_st_ops
passes!
Please spin a proper fixes patch, and feel free to add:
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxx>
Is that in a hurry? If not, I would like to send it with the upcoming
patchset.
This is a separate fix, right? What patchset are you referring to where
the fix would be in?
Yes, you are right! I'll send a bug fix patch as soon as possible.
Coming soon is the bpf_prog_pack for RV64 Trampoline, which currently
does not seem to be related to the bugfix, will populate the commit
message and send it later.😁
As of now 6.8-rc1 is broken! It would be a great with a fix asap...
Cheers,
Björn
