Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 2024/1/22 23:07, Björn Töpel wrote: >> Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>>> On 2024/1/22 22:33, Björn Töpel wrote: >>>>> Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> Add Zbb support [0] to optimize code size and performance of RV64 JIT. >>>>>> Meanwhile, adjust the code for unification and simplification. Tests >>>>>> test_bpf.ko and test_verifier have passed, as well as the relative >>>>>> testcases of test_progs*. >>>>>> >>>>>> Link: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/releases/download/1.0.0/bitmanip-1.0.0-38-g865e7a7.pdf [0] >>>>>> >>>>>> v3 resend: >>>>>> - resend for mail be treated as spam. >>>>>> >>>>>> v3: >>>>>> - Change to early-exit code style and make code more explicit. >>>>> >>>>> Lehui, >>>>> >>>>> Sorry for the delay. I'm chasing a struct_ops RISC-V BPF regression in >>>>> 6.8-rc1, I will need to wrap my head around that prior reviewing >>>>> properly. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Oh, I also found the problem with struct ops and fixed it >> >> Pu, with your patch bpf_iter_setsockopt, bpf_tcp_ca, and dummy_st_ops >> passes! >> >> Please spin a proper fixes patch, and feel free to add: >> >> Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > > Is that in a hurry? If not, I would like to send it with the upcoming > patchset. This is a separate fix, right? What patchset are you referring to where the fix would be in? As of now 6.8-rc1 is broken! It would be a great with a fix asap... Cheers, Björn
