Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for set_mempolicy with a lsm prog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 3:22 AM KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 10:06 AM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The result as follows,
> >   #263/1   set_mempolicy/MPOL_BIND_without_lsm:OK
> >   #263/2   set_mempolicy/MPOL_DEFAULT_without_lsm:OK
> >   #263/3   set_mempolicy/MPOL_BIND_with_lsm:OK
> >   #263/4   set_mempolicy/MPOL_DEFAULT_with_lsm:OK
> >   #263     set_mempolicy:OK
> >   Summary: 1/4 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>
> Please write a commit description on what the test actually does. I

will do it.

> even think of something simple that mentions a BPF LSM program that
> denies all mbind with the mode MPOL_BIND and checks whether the
> corresponding syscall is denied when the program is loaded.

It does. Additionally, it verifies whether the mbind syscall is denied
with different modes, such as MPOL_DEFAULT."

-- 
Regards
Yafang





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux