Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 3/4] bpf, x64: Load tail_call_cnt pointer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/12/23 02:03, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:27:24PM +0800, Leon Hwang wrote:
>> Rename RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT() to LOAD_TAIL_CALL_CNT_PTR().
>>
>> With previous commit, rax is used to propagate tail_call_cnt pointer
>> instead of tail_call_cnt. So, LOAD_TAIL_CALL_CNT_PTR() is better.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> IMHO this is out of the scope for this set. We are going to target the bpf
> tree and this patch can be send to bpf-next in the future.
> 

LGTM.

Thanks,
Leon

>> ---
>>  arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux