Re: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: Relax time_tai test for equal timestamps in tai_forward

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 18:29:11 +0000 you wrote:
> We're observing test flakiness on an arm64 platform which might not
> have timestamps as precise as x86. The test log looks like:
> 
>   test_time_tai:PASS:tai_open 0 nsec
>   test_time_tai:PASS:test_run 0 nsec
>   test_time_tai:PASS:tai_ts1 0 nsec
>   test_time_tai:PASS:tai_ts2 0 nsec
>   test_time_tai:FAIL:tai_forward unexpected tai_forward: actual 1702348135471494160 <= expected 1702348135471494160
>   test_time_tai:PASS:tai_gettime 0 nsec
>   test_time_tai:PASS:tai_future_ts1 0 nsec
>   test_time_tai:PASS:tai_future_ts2 0 nsec
>   test_time_tai:PASS:tai_range_ts1 0 nsec
>   test_time_tai:PASS:tai_range_ts2 0 nsec
>   #199     time_tai:FAIL
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf] selftests/bpf: Relax time_tai test for equal timestamps in tai_forward
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e1ba7f64b192

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux