Re: [PATCH v1 bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_kptr_xchg stashing of bpf_rb_root

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 13:17:22 -0800 you wrote:
> There was some confusion amongst Meta sched_ext folks regarding whether
> stashing bpf_rb_root - the tree itself, rather than a single node - was
> supported. This patch adds a small test which demonstrates this
> functionality: a local kptr with rb_root is created, a node is created
> and added to the tree, then the tree is kptr_xchg'd into a mapval.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@xxxxxx>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v1,bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_kptr_xchg stashing of bpf_rb_root
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/1b4c7e20bfd6

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux