Re: [PATCH v1 bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_kptr_xchg stashing of bpf_rb_root

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/4/23 4:17 PM, Dave Marchevsky wrote:
There was some confusion amongst Meta sched_ext folks regarding whether
stashing bpf_rb_root - the tree itself, rather than a single node - was
supported. This patch adds a small test which demonstrates this
functionality: a local kptr with rb_root is created, a node is created
and added to the tree, then the tree is kptr_xchg'd into a mapval.

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@xxxxxx>

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux