Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] mm: mempolicy: Revise comment regarding mempolicy mode flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 2:32 PM Huang, Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES, MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES, and MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING are
> > mode flags applicable to both set_mempolicy(2) and mbind(2) system calls.
> > It's worth noting that MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING was initially introduced in
> > commit bda420b98505 ("numa balancing: migrate on fault among multiple bound
> > nodes") exclusively for set_mempolicy(2). However, it was later made a
> > shared flag for both set_mempolicy(2) and mbind(2) following
> > commit 6d2aec9e123b ("mm/mempolicy: do not allow illegal
> > MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING | MPOL_LOCAL in mbind()").
> >
> > This revised version aims to clarify the details regarding the mode flags.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for fixing this.
>
> Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> And, please revise the manpage for mbind() too.  As we have done for
> set_mempolicy(),
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210120061235.148637-3-ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx/

Thanks for your review. will do it.

-- 
Regards
Yafang





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux