Hi, Alexei, the delete element api of stackmap return E2BIG when the key
size beyond the buckets size, so i try to keep the same approach. Maybe
it's not necessary, anyway, thanks for your reply.
在 2023/11/6 下午11:59, Tao Chen 写道:
---------- Forwarded message ---------
发件人： *Alexei Starovoitov* <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: 2023年11月5日周日 04:54
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Use E2BIG instead of ENOENT
To: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:chen.dylane@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:song@xxxxxxxxxx>>, Jiri Olsa
<jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>>, Alexei Starovoitov
<ast@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ast@xxxxxxxxxx>>, Daniel Borkmann
<daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>>, Yonghong Song
<yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>>, Martin KaFai
Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx>>, John Fastabend
<john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>>, Hao Luo
<haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx>>, bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 7:44 PM Tao Chen <chen.dylane@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:chen.dylane@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Use E2BIG instead of ENOENT when the key size beyond the buckets size,
> it seems more meaningful.
seems more meaningful?
Sorry. That's hardly a reason to break someone's code.
