Re: [PATCH] bpf: Use E2BIG instead of ENOENT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Use E2BIG instead of ENOENT
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2023 13:54:06 -0700
Cc: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>, Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx>, bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20231104024444.385484-1-chen.dylane@gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 7:44 PM Tao Chen <chen.dylane@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Use E2BIG instead of ENOENT when the key size beyond the buckets size,
> it seems more meaningful.

seems more meaningful?
Sorry. That's hardly a reason to break someone's code.

References:
- [PATCH] bpf: Use E2BIG instead of ENOENT
  - From: Tao Chen

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Reduce overhead of LSMs with static calls
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v10 10/13] bpf, net: switch to dynamic registration
Previous by thread: [PATCH] bpf: Use E2BIG instead of ENOENT
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Use E2BIG instead of ENOENT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux