On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 6:24 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Did you get round to fixing this, or did you decide to leave it as is? > > Trying to recall, was there anything to do on the libbpf side, or was > it purely a compiler-side change? I'm not 100% sure TBH. I'd like clang to behave consistently for local_id and target_id. I don't know whether that would break libbpf. Lorenz