Re: bpf_core_type_id_kernel is not consistent with bpf_core_type_id_local

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 8:46 AM Lorenz Bauer <lorenz.bauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 5:50 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > But I see your point. Maybe we should preserve the original type
> > for BTF_TYPE_ID_TARGET as well. Will check what libbpf/kernel
> > will handle 'const int *' case and get back to this thread later.
> >
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Lorenz
>
> Did you get round to fixing this, or did you decide to leave it as is?

Trying to recall, was there anything to do on the libbpf side, or was
it purely a compiler-side change?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux