Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 06/10] bpf: pass attached BTF to the bpf_struct_ops subsystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/30/23 12:28 PM, thinker.li@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@xxxxxxxxx>

Giving a BTF, the bpf_struct_ops knows the right place to look up type info
associated with a type ID. This enables a user space program to load a
struct_ops object linked to a struct_ops type defined by a module, by
providing the module BTF (fd).

This describes about the struct_ops map creation change (by adding value_type_btf_obj_fd)? It could be described more clearly in the commit message, like specify the value_type_btf_obj_fd addition and how it is used in the struct_ops map creation.


The bpf_prog includes attach_btf in aux which is passed along with the
bpf_attr when loading the program. The purpose of attach_btf is to
determine the btf type of attach_btf_id. The attach_btf_id is then used to
identify the traced function for a trace program. In the case of struct_ops
programs, it is used to identify the struct_ops type of the struct_ops
object that a program is attached to.

Does attach_btf_obj_fd also work?

[ ... ]

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index 256516aba632..db2bbba50e38 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -694,6 +694,7 @@ static void __bpf_struct_ops_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
  		bpf_jit_uncharge_modmem(PAGE_SIZE);
  	}
  	bpf_map_area_free(st_map->uvalue);
+	btf_put(st_map->st_ops_desc->btf);
  	bpf_map_area_free(st_map);
  }
@@ -735,16 +736,31 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
  	const struct btf_type *t, *vt;
  	struct module *mod = NULL;
  	struct bpf_map *map;
+	struct btf *btf;
  	int ret;
- st_ops_desc = bpf_struct_ops_find_value(btf_vmlinux, attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id);
-	if (!st_ops_desc)
-		return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
+	if (attr->value_type_btf_obj_fd) {
+		/* The map holds btf for its whole life time. */

It took me a while to parse this comment and connect it with the btf_put(st_map->st_ops_desc->btf) in the __bpf_struct_ops_map_free() above.

It is now like "btf" owns "struct_ops_desc" which also stores a pointer pointing back to itself, like "btf->struct_ops_desc->btf". The struct_ops_desc->btf was not initialized by st_map but st_map will increment its refcount much later.

Can btf be directly stored in the st_map->btf instead and map_alloc holds the refcnt of st_map->btf and btf_put(st_map->btf) in map_free?


+		btf = btf_get_by_fd(attr->value_type_btf_obj_fd);
+		if (IS_ERR(btf))
+			return ERR_PTR(PTR_ERR(btf));
+
+		if (btf != btf_vmlinux) {
+			mod = btf_try_get_module(btf);
+			if (!mod) {
+				ret = -EINVAL;
+				goto errout;
+			}
+		}
+	} else {
+		btf = btf_vmlinux;
+		btf_get(btf);
+	}
- if (st_ops_desc->btf != btf_vmlinux) {
-		mod = btf_try_get_module(st_ops_desc->btf);
-		if (!mod)
-			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	st_ops_desc = bpf_struct_ops_find_value(btf, attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id);
+	if (!st_ops_desc) {
+		ret = -ENOTSUPP;
+		goto errout;
  	}
vt = st_ops_desc->value_type;





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux