On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 12:37, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 3:28 PM Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 01:14, Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 09:41:15AM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
> > > >On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 03:49, Masahiro Yamada
> > > ><yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >[...]
> > > >> > Yes, the BPF samples require clang/LLVM with BPF support to build. Any
> > > >> > suggestion on a good way to address this (missing tools), better than
> > > >> > the warning above? After the commit 394053f4a4b3 ("kbuild: make single
> > > >> > targets work more correctly"), it's no longer possible to build
> > > >> > samples/bpf without support in the samples/Makefile.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> You can with
> > > >>
> > > >> "make M=samples/bpf"
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >Oh, I didn't know that. Does M= support "output" builds (O=)?
>
> No.
> O= points to the output directory of vmlinux,
> not of the external module.
>
> You cannot put the build artifacts from samples/bpf/
> in a separate directory.
>
Hmm, I can't even get "make M=samples/bpf/" to build. Am I missing
something obvious?
Prior 394053f4a4b3 "make samples/bpf/" and "make O=/foo/bar
samples/bpf/" worked, but I guess I can live with that...
Thanks!
Björn
>
>
> > > >I usually just build samples/bpf/ with:
> > > >
> > > > $ make V=1 O=/home/foo/build/bleh samples/bpf/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Björn
> > >
> > > Shouldn't README be updated?
> > >
> >
> > Hmm, the M= variant doesn't work at all for me. The build is still
> > broken for me. Maybe I'm missing anything obvious...
> >
> >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Ivan Khoronzhuk
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada
