On 2019-07-24 08:10, Kevin Laatz wrote: > Currently, addresses are chunk size aligned. This means, we are very > restricted in terms of where we can place chunk within the umem. For > example, if we have a chunk size of 2k, then our chunks can only be placed > at 0,2k,4k,6k,8k... and so on (ie. every 2k starting from 0). > > This patch introduces the ability to use unaligned chunks. With these > changes, we are no longer bound to having to place chunks at a 2k (or > whatever your chunk size is) interval. Since we are no longer dealing with > aligned chunks, they can now cross page boundaries. Checks for page > contiguity have been added in order to keep track of which pages are > followed by a physically contiguous page. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Laatz <kevin.laatz@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > v2: > - Add checks for the flags coming from userspace > - Fix how we get chunk_size in xsk_diag.c > - Add defines for masking the new descriptor format > - Modified the rx functions to use new descriptor format > - Modified the tx functions to use new descriptor format > > v3: > - Add helper function to do address/offset masking/addition > --- > include/net/xdp_sock.h | 17 ++++++++ > include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h | 9 ++++ > net/xdp/xdp_umem.c | 18 +++++--- > net/xdp/xsk.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > net/xdp/xsk_diag.c | 2 +- > net/xdp/xsk_queue.h | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 6 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) <...> > + > +static inline u64 xsk_umem_handle_offset(struct xdp_umem *umem, u64 handle, > + u64 offset) > +{ > + if (umem->flags & XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNKS) > + return handle |= (offset << XSK_UNALIGNED_BUF_OFFSET_SHIFT); > + else > + return handle += offset; > +} |= and += are not necessary here, | and + are enough. In the unaligned mode, it's not supported to run xsk_umem_handle_offset multiple times, and it's assumed that offset is zero. I'll explain the need in my following comment to patch 6. <...>