On 07/12/2019 10:55 AM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: >> Am 11.07.2019 um 22:35 schrieb Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >> >> On 07/11, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: >>> Use PT_REGS_RC(ctx) instead of ctx->rax, which is not present on s390. >>> >>> This patch series consists of three preparatory commits, which make it >>> possible to use PT_REGS_RC in BPF selftests, followed by the actual fix. >>> >> Still looks good to me, thanks! >> >> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Again, should probably go via bpf to fix the existing tests, not bpf-next >> (but I see bpf tree is not synced with net tree yet). > > Sorry, I missed your comment the last time. You are right - that’s the > reason I’ve been sending this to bpf-next so far — loop*.c don’t even > exist in the bpf tree. Applied to bpf tree (and also added Stanislav's Tested-by to the last one), thanks!
