> Am 11.07.2019 um 22:35 schrieb Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On 07/11, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: >> Use PT_REGS_RC(ctx) instead of ctx->rax, which is not present on s390. >> >> This patch series consists of three preparatory commits, which make it >> possible to use PT_REGS_RC in BPF selftests, followed by the actual fix. >> > Still looks good to me, thanks! > > Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Again, should probably go via bpf to fix the existing tests, not bpf-next > (but I see bpf tree is not synced with net tree yet). Sorry, I missed your comment the last time. You are right - that’s the reason I’ve been sending this to bpf-next so far — loop*.c don’t even exist in the bpf tree.
