On 03/20/2019 08:39 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > I think you need to convince Dave and Eric that > above surgery is necessary to do the hack in patch 6 with > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sk_buff, bpf_flow_skb); > Yes, this is a huge code churn. Honestly I believe we are going too far in this series. > I think the better option it to introduce new prog type that works > without skb. I think it can be pretty close to shape and form to xdp. >
