In my opinion this patch is better than nothing, until a proper solution is developed.
Regards
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry but NAP is not as simple as GN, thats why the NAP bridge is not
being created by network service.
NAP server can really be consider a bluetooth router so we probably
need something more advanced than
creating a normal bridge. Perhaps we can use a daemon that can handle
this 'router' functionality, but Im
afraid it still doesn't exists.
I still need to check what is going on in case of GN server, but I
guess the debug normally helps so I will
probably make them available in cvs.
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Engenheiro de Computação
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel
