Karen,
Most employers don't want NVDA, and will only allow Jaws.
In Nebraska, if an employer said put on whatever works, the
counselors
will
use NVDA, because of the cost of Jaws.
If some of the clients in a call center already use Jaws, but
don't know
NVDA, the counselor will use Jaws, because the other clients
will
need
to
learn one of the two.
So it's all choice, but in the workplace, it depends on what
the
employer
will allow.
Also, sometimes scripts need to be made, and there are more
Jaws
scripters
available than there are NVDA add-on writers.
So this perception that Jaws is forced by rehab, from my 31
years
in the
business I can say is rubbish.
Now, if a counselor did not know how to use NVDA, and either
may
be
chosen,
the rehab counselor is able to select the one that the
counselor
feels
is
best for the student and for the counselor's teaching.
When it comes to part B moneys, which is used for
non-vocational
purchases,
where a lot of Jaws purchases come from, it is in the agency's
best
interest
to spend as little as possible, because that doesn't come back
like VR
expenditures do.
Glenn
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karen Lewellen" <klewellen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "K0LNY_Glenn" <glenn@ervin.email>
Cc: <speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Milan Zamazal"
<pdm@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
<Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2022 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: "Accessibility in Fedora Workstation" (fwd)
The challenge with that example is that, as one often gets
reminded,
the
rehab systems track record for facilitating employment for
their
clients
is quite poor.
With a high percentage of unemployment among our clients.
Making,
speaking personally, your buying Jaws for personal use not
really
reflecting how the system would respond to an alternative
request.
Now if someone from organized rehab said, okay freedom
scientific, we
are
creating an employment program where our clients will train in
Linux,
needing a solid screen reader solution for the system. We will
give you
an
exclusive development contract for s millions to create the
tool.
Fs would likely say where do we sign?
On Sat, 13 Aug 2022, K0LNY_Glenn wrote:
True enough, but largely, rehab people typically use Windows
at
work,
and
probably at home, but they need to cater to the needs of the
client.
If a client used Linux, I doubt that any rehab counselor
would
advocate
that
the client switch to Windows, unless that was needed for a
specific
job.
In Nebraska, we purchased Jaws much more for personal use
than
we did
for
work related situations.
So if FS made a JFL, and people were using Linux, rehab would
indeed
purchase a JFL product.
Glenn
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karen Lewellen" <klewellen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "K0LNY_Glenn" <glenn@ervin.email>
Cc: <speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Milan Zamazal"
<pdm@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
<Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2022 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: "Accessibility in Fedora Workstation" (fwd)
there was an interesting discussion a month or so back on the
blinux
list
about how long it took completing tasks in the gui as apposed
to say
command line, the comments were quite informative.
Still, fs has never marketed largely to the end user. Instead
they
market
to the American rehab community.
how much market research has the rehab community done to
support the
need
for choices?
How many rehab counselors support training in Linux?
one comment made by the subject of this thread about poor
quality
speech
is a fine one...out of the box Linux has few speech choices.
everyone
brings their needs to the table there.
if you want to get fs to care about Linux, you need to prove
there is
money for them there, from their main source of income.
On Sat, 13 Aug 2022, K0LNY_Glenn wrote:
Well since Orca seems to work on so many distros, I don't
know why
FS
would
not be able to do the same.
If Jaws users could switch into Linux, it would be a real
game
changer,
and
I think with lots more Blind Linux users, we would start
seeing
accessibility in Linux not being a second thought.
Glenn
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karen Lewellen" <klewellen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "K0LNY_Glenn" <glenn@ervin.email>
Cc: <speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Milan Zamazal"
<pdm@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
<Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2022 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: "Accessibility in Fedora Workstation" (fwd)
Well technically freedom scientific does not exist any
longer, being
bought
by another company.
Still, I can respect why they, or nvda have not created
their
tools
for
Linux.
That is because as I understand it, Linux is quite like
clay. You
can
mold a distribution into almost anything. there are various
personifications of the system, all sorts of ways and
changes
and
options
for creativity.
however adaptive tools are often extensions of physical
characteristics,
hands, eyes, ears, brains, combinations of these.
To build solid assistive tools one must have a solid
foundation as
it
were. that is part of why there have needed to be so few
Apple
efforts
at
inclusion, they created with, and then created in-house
adaptive
tools
for various populations that were built into the system.
Although Microsoft did not bother until much later, in
theory
at
least,
the
consistency of windows is what makes it possible for
freedom
or the
former
gw micro or nvda to create something that can in theory
work.
Floor for the furniture is somewhat solid.
Just my thoughts,
On Sat, 13 Aug 2022, K0LNY_Glenn wrote:
I would like to see Freedom Scientific make a Jaws For
Linux.
JFL
I'd certainly pay the yearly rental fee for it, and it
would bring
many
more
users into Linux.
FS could, with its resources, possibly make it more
robust
than
Orca.
Glenn
----- Original Message -----
From: "Milan Zamazal" <pdm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <speakup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2022 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: "Accessibility in Fedora Workstation" (fwd)
"KL" == Karen Lewellen
<klewellen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
writes:
KL> What bothers me most are his lack of actual
qualifications,
and
KL> absolute dismissal of what he has not experienced..as
if
KL> he
KL> defines Linux usage for everyone. That attitude is
KL> dangerous,
KL> because he is educating those outside of the
KL> accessibility
KL> experiences, who will believe his ignorance is
factual.
KL> he
has
KL> to be expert, it is his job.
Hi Karen,
I know Lukas personally and I admire his skills and
qualifications.
I
also know first hand that he is open to constructive
feedback and
I
believe heâ?Td be happy to be corrected about possible
technical
inaccuracies in the interview. It may be also a good
opportunity
to
find out whatâ?Ts possibly missing in making anybody
better
informed.
As for â?oabsolute dismissal of what he has not
experiencedâ?�,
what
reasonable free software alternatives to a less or more
standard
desktop
with Orca and a software synthesizer can you see for a
common
blind
user
who needs to use a fully working web browser, to read and
process
text
documents, to be compatible with other computer users,
etc.?
And letâ?Ts be realistic. We celebrate every single
developer
hired
to
improve accessibility. This tells something about the
state of
the
matters. We cannot expect that a single person will fix
all the
kinds
of accessibility problems in all the environments. Lukas
works at
his
job focusing on certain areas currently seen there as
urgent ones
and I
appreciate this opportunity. Anybody else seeing a need
to
work
on
other areas is welcome to contribute to whatever sees
fit,
as I
do.
Regards,
Milan