Re: anonymity, threads, signatures, and confusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
Yes, I'm aware of that unfortunate history.  However, there's no reason to make the list less useful, just to protect email addresses.
I suppose you are the list owner making this unilateral decision for everyone? If not, more useful out weighing email address protection, for whom exactly? I am unsure what allows you to make these decisions, define these issues for others, when the current decision was discussed and the choice made. Nothing presently prevents individuals from placing anything they wish into the body of their posts.


Adding an identifying signature (however obscure) lets folks follow conversations more easily.  If I know that the "FredQ" who posted one message posted another one earlier, it gives me useful context.

- Rich Morin (rdm@xxxxxxxx)


_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list



_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Speakup]     [Fedora]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]