Tim here. I just installed FreeDOS on a junker machine and went to install the DOS version of JAWS. It didn't complain, but I didn't find any option for software speech, only hardware output. If someone is better versed in how to get JAWS-for-DOS to use a soft synth, I'd be glad to experiment further and document the entire install process. That said, there's nothing I ever performed back when I was a "power DOS user" that I've not been able to do far more easily in a real shell. -tim On June 3, 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > With dos, you have to have accessibility up using a floppy drive > for operating system and screen reader stuff. Then run setup.exe > on the burned dos media or dos floppies and hope dos doesn't turkey > up your screen reader by writing too fast to the screen. freedos > will turkey up your screen reader since it writes too fast to the > screen by default. If you can manage to get past all of that, a > config.sys file on the installed dos hard drive with nansi.sys /ns > will slow the screen writing to the point your screen reader will > be able to speak. It's the int 10 screen writing that's too fast > for screen readers in dos but the int 21 screen writing which is > ansi standard works just fine. It may be possible to install a > config.sys file in the freedos install media with nansi.sys /ns but > this will need someone to rebuild the install media and will not be > an official rebuild. I very much doubt the freedos developers have > any interest in doing such a rebuild at all. > > On Fri, 2 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 21:46:03 > > From: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: living in the console. > > > > Hmm, yeah, that's cool once you have things installed. I'm > > talking about the general installing of dos to start with, > > though. How's that managed accessibly? > > > > > > > > Mark Peveto > > Registered Linux user number 600552 > > Everything happens after coffee! > > > > On Fri, 2 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > > > >> Here is how I get my dectalk express to run with Vocal Eyes. All > >> my speech files are in a directory called c:\speech. > >> > >> My file c:\dectalk.bat contains the following: > >> c:\speech\talk.bat > >> > >> The file c:\speech\talk.bat contains: > >> > >> @echo off > >> rem the following line loads the Vocal-Eyes synthesizer driver > >> rem it expects dectalk on com1 > >> c:\SPEECH\DTEXP /!c1 > >> rem the following line loads Vocal-Eyes > >> c:\SPEECH\ve > >> > >> > >> With all the files in place I run: > >> dectalk from the c:\> prompt, and Vocal Eyes starts working. > >> > >> > >> With vocal eyes working I then run Telix, and I'm off to > >> the races. > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 07:46:57AM -0500, Linux for blind > >> general discussion wrote: > >>> I knew they had, but haven't been able to find it now...not on > >>> their site any more. > >>> > >>> > >>> Mark Peveto > >>> Registered Linux user number 600552 > >>> Everything happens after coffee! > >>> > >>> On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > >>> > >>>> Henter-Joyce released JAWS for DOS as freeware back in 1999, > >>>> so if you can find the executable somewhere then you should be > >>>> good! http://www.nfbcal.org/nfb-rd/1526.html > >>>> > >>>> On 01/06/17 21:52, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > >>>>> I made a free dos cd. I've got a dectalk express hooked up > >>>>> to this machine. I have demos of asap and vocal eyes. > >>>>> Couldn't get jaws for dos, which I really wanted. But if I > >>>>> put the cd in, and let it spin a while, how do I get dectalk > >>>>> talking so I can work the install and stuff? Been years > >>>>> since I've done this, and a reader isn't readily available. > >>>>> More input would be helpful. thanks yall. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Mark Peveto > >>>>> Registered Linux user number 600552 > >>>>> Everything happens after coffee! > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> again, my note on hardware, starting with a good dos > >>>>>> synthesizer and screen > >>>>>> reading program. > >>>>>> If your machine is dos ready, you can manage, for example > >>>>>> including the start > >>>>>> files for your screen reader on the disk you are using. > >>>>>> Or installing first > >>>>>> from floppy etc. > >>>>>> Depends on what you are using all the way around. > >>>>>> Karen > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> How's a feller handle installation if he can't see the > >>>>>>> screen? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Mark Peveto > >>>>>>> Registered Linux user number 600552 > >>>>>>> Everything happens after coffee! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Tim here. The FreeDOS folks just released version 1.2 > >>>>>>>> earlier this year > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> http://www.freedos.org/download/ > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> which is available for free and has multiple > >>>>>>>> installation-media images (ISOs to burn a CD along with a > >>>>>>>> boot-floppy image if your machine is so old that it won't > >>>>>>>> boot to a CD, as well as a disk-image files to write to a > >>>>>>>> USB disk) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> It's actively developed and should run pretty much any DOS > >>>>>>>> application that you throw at it. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -tim > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On June 1, 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Ok, this dos discussion makes me wanna run dos. Coolness! > >>>>>>>>> How can i get it? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Mark Peveto > >>>>>>>>> Registered Linux user number 600552 > >>>>>>>>> Everything happens after coffee! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The solution I've been using for years is to use my DOS > >>>>>>>>>> machine running Telix, a vt100 terminal emulator and > >>>>>>>>>> Vocal Eyes screen reader. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Then I just connect to my local linux box using a null > >>>>>>>>>> modem cable and from there run screen for multiple > >>>>>>>>>> consoles. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Linux does all the heavy lifting including mplayer, > >>>>>>>>>> lynx, ssh to remote accounts etc. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The best part of this mode of operation is that all linux > >>>>>>>>>> consoles feel the same. Regardless whether they are on > >>>>>>>>>> my local box, on my Panix shell account, or on a remote > >>>>>>>>>> work server. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> And as was pointed out, I can control all the speech > >>>>>>>>>> controls from my main keyboard. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 04:02:42PM -0400, Linux for > >>>>>>>>>> blind general discussion wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> If two local computers are available with one running > >>>>>>>>>>> dos and a compatible screen reader and a user is > >>>>>>>>>>> willing and able to work in the console it's possible > >>>>>>>>>>> with a null modem cable and a program like kermit or > >>>>>>>>>>> commo on the dos machine to connect to the other > >>>>>>>>>>> computer running linux and have all console output > >>>>>>>>>>> redirected out the linux serial port to the dos box. I > >>>>>>>>>>> did this once with only one version of linux and the > >>>>>>>>>>> information on how to do that is in one of linux-howtos > >>>>>>>>>>> serial howto files. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 14:03:36 > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Linux for blind general discussion > >>>>>>>>>>>> <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Linux for blind general > >>>>>>>>>>>> discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: > >>>>>>>>>>>> living in the console. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I am not. > >>>>>>>>>>>> since none of the Linux speech sources currently > >>>>>>>>>>>> support my synthesizer, it is not like I can just buy > >>>>>>>>>>>> a system. That means having one built and configured > >>>>>>>>>>>> locally..something I did not think would be such an > >>>>>>>>>>>> issue. I mean I do it regularly for DOS when I find a > >>>>>>>>>>>> later edition of DOS that gives me something > >>>>>>>>>>>> needful. My present dos package for example is only a > >>>>>>>>>>>> few years old comparatively speaking, has full USB > >>>>>>>>>>>> support, networking etc. However I have been trying to > >>>>>>>>>>>> find local talent for the Linux side for more than a > >>>>>>>>>>>> decade now, almost 15 years or so I imagine. User > >>>>>>>>>>>> groups tend to have a laid back perspective if they > >>>>>>>>>>>> can be found. clear, fundamental and step by step > >>>>>>>>>>>> information in basic but informative detail does not > >>>>>>>>>>>> exist, let alone in person training. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I even had someone try to install Linux to a drive and > >>>>>>>>>>>> send it, only not to have Linux support any of the > >>>>>>>>>>>> hand picked hardware, or for that person to have > >>>>>>>>>>>> included any way to reach the internet...I am serious. > >>>>>>>>>>>> I would ssh telnet into the box just like I do for > >>>>>>>>>>>> Shellworld which is now running Ubuntu 16.04, or my > >>>>>>>>>>>> dreamhost setup for work which is not as current. I > >>>>>>>>>>>> have no problem doing that at all, but the box must > >>>>>>>>>>>> exist setup to my specifications, I intend using it > >>>>>>>>>>>> for music making and media..which means in person real > >>>>>>>>>>>> skill. long distance has simply produced amusing > >>>>>>>>>>>> efforts with no progress. My favorite local effort was > >>>>>>>>>>>> when someone building a machine for me showed up with > >>>>>>>>>>>> a live disk prepared to introduce me to Linux. They > >>>>>>>>>>>> popped in the cd and we waited...and waited...and > >>>>>>>>>>>> waited lol! > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> besides, I think speekup still puts all the controls > >>>>>>>>>>>> on one side of the keyboard, not using the full > >>>>>>>>>>>> thing, which for me personally is counter productive. > >>>>>>>>>>>> My present screen readers, all of the ones on my > >>>>>>>>>>>> machine actually, let me get information without ever > >>>>>>>>>>>> taking my hands off the keys unless I need to review. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Most important though since all software speech makes > >>>>>>>>>>>> me dizzy is the need to keep the voice I have with > >>>>>>>>>>>> whatever I am using. Long answer to as short comment, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Kare > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you're in the market for a linux laptop, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.thinkpenguin.com/ is one good source. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:57:30 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Linux for blind general discussion > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Linux for blind general > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> living in the console. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is why I am going to find one on line > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere. I have no actual Linux box myself. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kare > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 31 May 2017, Linux for blind general > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh I think there is a file somewhere called > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.exe or > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> edbrowse-setup > or something like that. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry it has been many years since I did the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup. The readme file will tell you all about it. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 31, 2017, at 10:26 PM, Linux for blind > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> general > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion > <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well it must require more because when I tried > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> visiting > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> paypal I just > got a series of numbers and a blank > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> page. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even trying for a help menu produced the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question, are you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> looking for > business solutions? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Granted we may not have it fully configured here > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at shellworld. Will hunt some sort of manual and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try again, Kare > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 31 May 2017, Linux for blind general > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion wrote: If you mean to browse something > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just type: edbrowse url > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> edbrowse file > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then you can use the same commands as ed. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> edbrowse is also an email reader/sender and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuff. I love it. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 30, 2017, at 5:08 PM, Linux for blind > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> general discussion > > <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Out of curiosity, what is the syntax for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ebrowse? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have it here at shellworld...I think, and I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wish to test > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> something. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karen > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 May 2017, Linux for blind > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> general > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Edbrowse may help for web browsing alonggg > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> surfraw-heavy. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from BlueMail for iPhone > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 25, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Linux for blind > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> general > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion > > > <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tim here > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark Peveto wrote > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Over the last couple days or so, I've considered > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> becoming a totally command line linux user. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm mostly there. Web browsing is the big > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hurdle > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for much of my > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> day-to-day use. Lynx/links/elinks work for many > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things, but some sites just need a fully > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modern-standards-supporting browser. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How would I print to my printer for example, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It depends on what you want to print, but it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> usually involves piping > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things to the "lp" ("line printer") program. It > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> configured to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use CUPS on the back end (and may already be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configured out of the box for you). > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Getting fancier output would involve > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rendering some > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sort of markup. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are tools to render HTML, LaTeX, PDFs, and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Word/LibreOffice > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> docs from the command-line to the printer. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know what you want to print, but I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suspect > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it can be done in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most cases. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> play an entire album from my music > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collection. It depends on your tastes, but > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are literally > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dozens of music > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> players. Some, such as > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mpg123/mpg312/aplay/ogg123 allow you to specify > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just the files you want on the command line and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it will play > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them. Others, like mplayer are similar but give > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you a little more control over playback. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's also mpd/mpc which is the Music > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Player > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daemon/Client that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runs in the background and doesn't really have a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GUI. The mpd program runs in the background and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the mpc program acts like a remote-control, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> letting you create/edit playlists, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> control playback, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc. I like the remote-control aspect as I can > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> map them to particular keys on my keyboard or > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aliases in the shell > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and have > > > quick > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> access to common commands with my media-keys. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I use "cmus" which has a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> text-mode GUI > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but also has a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remote-control interface like mpd/mpc. I start > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up tmux and have a pane for my alsamixer and cmus > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which lets me flip between > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> them > > > pretty > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readily. It allows me to make play-lists, search > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my collection, shuffle, etc, much like you'd be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> familiar with in a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> graphical > > > player. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How, also, would I create documents in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> something beyond text > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> format? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usually it's done with a markup that suits > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tastes. I personally > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have been writing HTML by hand since college in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the mid > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 90s so > > > that's > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what I reach for. But other people like > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TeX/LaTeX (it does produce some beautiful output > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and also has external library > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> support for > > > things > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like music markup letting you write scores) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> while other people like some of the more > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> light-weight markup languages like Markdown or > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RST or the like. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kick the tires on a few and see what > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feels > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural to you. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fortunately, there's a tool called "pandoc" that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lets you convert between a large number of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> input/output formats so you can write in Markdown > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and convert to PDF, or write in HTML and convert > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to MS-Word > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> format, or write in LaTeX and convert to ePub > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> minimal loss. And > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it outputs any of them in plain-text (though you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may lose some information in the process since > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plain-text doesn't support many features as you've > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> acknowledged) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How does one ditch the guy, and still enjoy > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> linux has to offer > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the console? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One program at a time (grins). So much like > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the items above, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's a matter of asking "I currently do XYZ in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the GUI > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but would > > > like > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do XYZ in the console" for whatever XYZ is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your next adventure. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I maintain a page listing a number of common > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> command-line tools: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tim.thechases.com/posts/cli/software-for-a-command-line-world/ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that can point you in the direction of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> various > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> applications to try > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out. Some might drive you crazy while others > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> might fit your brain just right. They should all > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be free and are likely in most software repos, so > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it doesn't cost you anything except a little time > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to try each one out. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm willing to learn how to do this, but who > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> decides to help > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me is gonna hafta be patient. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The folks on this list are a pretty friendly > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> & > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> patient bunch, so > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we'll be glad to help where we can. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -tim > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Rudy Vener > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>>>>>>>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>>>>>>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>>>>>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>>>>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>>>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Christopher (CJ) > >>>> chaltain at Gmail > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >>>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Blinux-list mailing list > >>> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >> > >> -- > >> Rudy Vener > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Blinux-list mailing list > >> Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Blinux-list mailing list > > Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list _______________________________________________ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list