There are plenty of people that need to live on both free and
proprietary worlds simultaneously.
Fernando
On 05/03/2017 08:09 AM, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
Tony Baechler here.
I have no opinion on the NVDA list being included. I was only asking
if it really belonged. That said, I think there is a Mozilla
accessibility list. Should it not be included since Firefox runs on
Windows? If there is a BSD accessibility list, should it be included
even though BSD isn't currently accessible? On the other hand, if we
include all accessibility lists for all operating systems and
platforms, while a great central resource, I think it would be too
hard to maintain and would be too unwieldy. As Kyle says, Windows
users don't really care about Linux lists. Then again, the ultimate
goal is Linux world domination, so the more Linux resources and the
easier they are to find, the better.
On 5/2/2017 10:23 AM, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
Looking further at this article, NVDA isn't relevant at all, especially
taking into account the fact that all the other lists mentioned are
GNU/Linux or Unix related. If NVDA is to be included, then we must also
include Eyes-Free for Android users, AppleVis for iOS users, any
Voiceover
lists available, The Chromebook accessibility list, etc. Since
everything
listed here is for GNU/Linux screen readers and toolkits, then NVDA not
being a Linux/Unix screen reader at all makes its list irrelevant here.
~Kyle
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list