Tony Baechler here.
I have no opinion on the NVDA list being included. I was only asking if it
really belonged. That said, I think there is a Mozilla accessibility list.
Should it not be included since Firefox runs on Windows? If there is a BSD
accessibility list, should it be included even though BSD isn't currently
accessible? On the other hand, if we include all accessibility lists for all
operating systems and platforms, while a great central resource, I think it
would be too hard to maintain and would be too unwieldy. As Kyle says,
Windows users don't really care about Linux lists. Then again, the ultimate
goal is Linux world domination, so the more Linux resources and the easier
they are to find, the better.
On 5/2/2017 10:23 AM, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
Looking further at this article, NVDA isn't relevant at all, especially
taking into account the fact that all the other lists mentioned are
GNU/Linux or Unix related. If NVDA is to be included, then we must also
include Eyes-Free for Android users, AppleVis for iOS users, any Voiceover
lists available, The Chromebook accessibility list, etc. Since everything
listed here is for GNU/Linux screen readers and toolkits, then NVDA not
being a Linux/Unix screen reader at all makes its list irrelevant here.
~Kyle
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list