Re: Blind vs. mainstream distros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tony Baechler here.

On 5/1/2017 10:58 AM, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
I'm not arguing that specialized distros are necessarily better or even
needed.  What I am saying is that if a distro is going to make releases
with builtin accessibility, they better have someone on their release
team who knows how it works and tests it on each release to make sure
that it doesn't bitrot.

Yes, absolutely! This is the problem I had with Gentoo. It worked great in 2007, but I couldn't tell if it even had any way to start speech when I checked a year or two ago. I didn't see anything to indicate that software speech is on the CD. That further illustrates my point that the nonprofit organization which needs to be formed, in addition to filing bugs against inaccessible packages and working with upstream developers, needs to get representatives on as many distros' accessibility and development teams as possible. Debian is in good shape, but Ubuntu could certainly use help. Don't get me started on Fedora again. There are, as others have said, lots of niche distros which have no accessibility. Kyle mentioned Mint for example, although Mint runs the Cinnamon desktop, so it's unsurprising that it wouldn't ship Orca. I read that they said they would ship Orca in the future, but again, who knows if they will, if anyone actually tests it and if it gets updated as new releases come out.

_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Speakup]     [Fedora]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]