Tony,
First of all, as far as I've been able to deduce over the years,
everyone *cares* about accessibility. The problem is that no one *knows
how* to best address any issues with it. Red Hat certainly does care. If
they didn't care, they wouldn't ship Orca, or they wouldn't implement
the alt+super+s shortcut to turn on Orca in GNOME. Defaults you say,
maybe. But still, if they didn't care, why would they do so much work to
get their installer working with Orca? I don't think all that work was
an accident.
With regard to yet another list, it's not necessary at all. We do still
have this list, and we can just put our names into our messages. Kyle
here .... In any case, if we don't want that, the FSF does have an
accessibility list as well.
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility
No sense making yet another Linux/free software accessibility list.
Either use this one, that one or both. In any case, we can't be blaming
Red Hat for the current state of this list. They did what they could do
as quickly as they could do it. Instead, if there is any blame to throw
around, we should be blaming the spammers that got us here.
~Kyle
_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list