Re: A challenging question?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



shellworld.net doesn't need to have mutt unless you need output saved in your shellworld.net account. When I go out to google, it's direct from my computer to their mail server and that's over a web only connection too. mutt is a command line application so anyone wanting high graphics is going to be seriously disappointed. It all comes down in text.

Only reason I made that offer is mutt takes time to study how to configure it and this would give you a leg up. if your office computer is windows, mutt won't work.

On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Karen Lewellen wrote:

Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 01:59:33
From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: A challenging question?

Fine, but logging into gmail is not the problem. It is gathering in a fashion that reflects how these e-mails appear in a low graphics environment. That and the volume. Whatever the program is, does it exist at shellworld? I have no other access to Linux at all, save for my office shell with dreamhost.


On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Jude DaShiell wrote:

tmux, not tmox.

On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Karen Lewellen wrote:

 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 23:42:30
 From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
 To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
 Subject: Re: A challenging question?

 Hi folks,
 I do wonder if we have tmox at shellworld.
 Actually, the printer friendly  edition of emails at google will produce
 fine text, and yes I can save the file with the p function.
 The challenge is, since this is court evidence, I must gather  likely a
 couple  hundred of them.
 Something to petition the judge regarding.
 Thanks for the ideas,
 Kare


 On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Tim Chase wrote:

>  On January 19, 2017, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> >  Asking just in case there is a simple tool  for this process.
> >  I need to capture several emails from my gmail account.  It is
> >  critical that the e-mails appear, as they do for me, not how they
> >  might in standard view, i. e. with alt tags  visible for anyone.
> >  Lynx, links, and e-links are the browsers I wish to use for this, I
> >  would imagine the alt tag would be different even if I had access
> >  to say Firefox.
> >  Depending on the target audience, a couple ways come to mind:
> >  1) In lynx-the-cat, use the "p" command to print to a file.  This is
>  basically the same thing as doing a "lynx -dump" on a page.  In
>  links-the-chain and elinks, you can use "File, Save formatted
>  document" to get the same sort of results.
> >  2) use your terminal emulator's copy/paste functionality to select
>  the content of the gmail session in lynx/links/elinks session
> >  3) fire up GNU screen or tmux, launch Lynx inside, browse to your
>  email, and then use the "scrollback" functionality in screen/tmux to
>  copy text off the screen into a buffer, then use the screen/tmux
>  scrollback-paste functionality to dump it into a file.
> >  4) use the "script" program to record the entire session with
>  timings:
> >   $ script --timing=gmail.timings gmail.script
>   $ lynx https://gmail.com
>   (do your thing)
>   $ exit  # leaves the "script" recording session
> >  this will give you two files "gmail.timings" and "gmail.script" which
>  you can then play back with
> >   $ scriptreplay gmail.timings gmail.script
> >  Now on to comparing:
> >  #1 is easiest choice with some of the best results for the use-case
>  you are describing.
> >  #2 & #3 are basically a screen capture of the text that you can dump
>  into a text file, but don't include any coloration or playback (like
>  #1).  Also, these usually end up being one screen at a time with
>  full-screen curses applications like lynx/links/elinks, so if your
>  text is more than one page, it's a bit annoying to capture, save,
>  scroll, capture, save, repeat. But they do work for any terminal
>  application, not just relying on browser-specific functionality.
> >  #4 gives an exact replay of the options, but requires a terminal that
>  understands it.  If you're playing back on the same terminal where
>  you recorded, this has no issues.  But if you're trying to share it,
>  there may be hurdles involved.  Also, while a quick test here
>  suggests that script doesn't capture passwords in certain modes, it
>  might if recording a lynx/links session, so I'd either only share it
>  with someone you trust with your gmail password, or redact the file
>  before sharing it.
> >  And if you haven't had a chance to play with screen/tmux, they're
>  incredibly powerful and well worth the investment of time (I
>  personally prefer and recommend tmux, but both are substantially
>  similar to the end user).
> >  As usual, my verbose replies are likely overkill, but hopefully give
>  you some options to explore. (grins)
> >  -tim
> > > > > > > >  _______________________________________________
>  Blinux-list mailing list
>  Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
> >
 _______________________________________________
 Blinux-list mailing list
 Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list


--

_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list




_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list


--

_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Speakup]     [Fedora]     [Linux Kernel]     [Yosemite News]     [Big List of Linux Books]