hi, ok that is good to know. that is true. that would be an interesting setup there for sure. charles On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Raul A. Gallegos wrote: > Hi. You can certainly have Linux on a hard drive by itself. Linux does > not depend on dos/windows/etc. I know someone who has a different linux > distribution on each of his partitions so he can learn all the distros. > He's got 4 hard drives so you can just imagine how many partitions he > has. lol. > > cbowman@netdoor.com said the following on Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:36:44AM -0600: > > > > hi, some one was asking me not long ago if it is posable to have just a > > system with linux, and no other os such as dos, or windows on it. is this > > posable, or do you have to have something elts? has eanybody here don that > > before? thanks. > > charles > > > > Net-Tamer V 1.11 - Test Drive > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Blinux-list@redhat.com > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > > -- > Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ men just upload their important > stuff on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;) > -- Linus Torvalds, about his failing hard drive on > linux.cs.helsinki.fi > -- Raul A. Gallegos mailto:raul@asmodean.net - http://www.asmodean.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Blinux-list@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list >