> Excellent. Thanks for this. I have been spending some time on fixing > that skcipher stuff (attached) although the stuff in my selective > backport does not need it. > :-) Yep, precisely why I wanted this as well. I suppose we should still ultimately fix that backport, but overall we do want selective backports to be more insulated. Or perhaps we should just give up on backporting lib80211_* and ipw drivers. They haven't changed in years anyway, so it's unlikely that anyone would want use a backport for them, I guess. Except if you look at a distro-level backport, since they do integrate cfg80211 and thus can't be used in conjunction with a backport thereof. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in