Re: [PATCH] backport: allow compilation with Ubuntu's 3.13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:34 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 08:31 +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:27 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 16:42 +0300, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote:
> > > 
> > > > +#if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE == KERNEL_VERSION(3,13,11) && UTS_UBUNTU_RELEASE_ABI < 24)
> > > 
> > > Now that I look at this again, I'm confused - shouldn't this whole thing
> > > have a ! in front?
> > > 
> > 
> > why?
> > I need this definition only for Ubuntu releases that are below 24.
> > Canonical ported that starting 24.
> > What am I missing?
> 
> But every mainline kernel, say 3.10, also needs it. Also Ubuntu with
> 3.10, for example.
> 

You are right obviously.
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����i���l�)��jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux