Re: [PATCH] backport: allow compilation with Ubuntu's 3.13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 08:31 +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:27 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 16:42 +0300, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote:
> > 
> > > +#if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE == KERNEL_VERSION(3,13,11) && UTS_UBUNTU_RELEASE_ABI < 24)
> > 
> > Now that I look at this again, I'm confused - shouldn't this whole thing
> > have a ! in front?
> > 
> 
> why?
> I need this definition only for Ubuntu releases that are below 24.
> Canonical ported that starting 24.
> What am I missing?

But every mainline kernel, say 3.10, also needs it. Also Ubuntu with
3.10, for example.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux