On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 09:12:03AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 09:02 +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > But the *code* changes > > > you're making here that check whether bp_prefix is being duplicated > > > aren't necessary for that, and are in fact confusing and dangerous. > > > > Understood, thanks for the review, hopefully this is addressed with the > > latest series. > > Actually, maybe you wanted these changes because you didn't want to end > up with CONFIG_BACKPORT_BPAUTO_ for integration? I think that's a small > price to pay though for code complexity trade-off, IMHO you should > accept CONFIG_BACKPORT_BPAUTO_ and remove the code changes. Quite the contrary, I did this to get CONFIG_BACKPORT_BPAUTO_ and not CONFIG_BACKPORT_BACKPORT_. So right now I do get CONFIG_BACKPORT_BPAUTO_ for integration (with the v2 patch series). Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
